Can mettā stay a posture, not a glow?
In the early texts, loving-kindness is often less a warm feeling than a way of facing people. In MN 7, the Buddha describes a practitioner moving through the world with a mind of goodwill, without clinging to a special glow. AN 4.36 also frames it as a broad, all-embracing orientation, not a private mood that proves practice is going well.
That distinction matters in a Sydney room: we can keep mettā simple, outward, and practical. It can be a cue to soften toward a difficult person, not a score for how nice we feel after sitting.
I’m curious how others keep it from becoming a test. Do you use a short phrase, a breath, a memory of someone, or a simple image? What keeps loving-kindness from turning into a performance, while still letting it touch ordinary moments?